forsyth: (DotDotDot)
So, Kraft foods buys Cadbury, the British company that makes chocolate eggs and other chocolates. CEO of the company gets a huge bonus, to the tune of $26,000,000 due to her "exceptional role" in the deal. (Her nominal salary? $1,500,000. The rest is "bonuses", because they "froze" executive pay at Kraft) $4,200,000 of her salary increase came in the form of bonuses to her pension.

Meanwhile, Kraft is threatening three thousand employees at Cadbury with three year salary freezes unless they "voluntarily" opt out of Cadbury's pension plan, because there's a clause that prevents them from just closing it.

Once upon a time, a very brief time, executives who manipulated the company to enrich themselves while screwing the company and the workers over was called embezzlement or fraud. Before that, it was the way aristocracies ran. Now? It's "good business".

Welcome to the wonderful world of modern capitalism.
forsyth: (LeChuck)
Well, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that "companies have a free-speech right to spend as much as they wish to persuade voters to elect or defeat candidates for Congress and the White House."

Which is, of course, sheerest bullshit, because a corporation is not a person, and has no "free speech rights". Nice to know bribery's legal now, though. This is a hell of a lot more important than some nut winning an election in Massachusetts. And bodes much much worse for our country.

The Worst Presidency Ever is a gift that just keeps on giving.
forsyth: (LeChuck)
When are the frickin Democrats gonna grow a frickin spine and realize they're the frickin MAJORITY in Congress, and don't need to bow down to the whims of a criminal president and his lackeys? Cripes. Now they're caving on the bullshit warrantless wiretapping (aka the President can spy on anybody he wants) bill, and including provisions retroactively declaring the phone companies who broke the law by letting the NSA etc spy on Americans without a warrant don't have to face any punishment.

Glenn Greenwald explains here.
forsyth: (LeChuck)
Last year, the top 1% of Americans made 21.2% of the total income in the US.

That's probably why, despite all the "great" numbers for the economy, most people don't think it's going so well. Because they're not. And neither is anyone they know. All the economic gains of the past almost decade have been going to the same tiny subset of people, rather than being spread out through society. All that extra productivity and work people are putting in doesn't come back to them, it gets hoovered up to the top.

And it doesn't trickle back down.
forsyth: (DotDotDot)
My last post reminded me of something else. I finished reading The K Street Gang. It was a good summary of everything, although in the last chapter the writer switched back to trying to blame the corruption on "big government" and those gosh darn liberals who took power after Nixon and tried to regulate campaign money. But that's not what this is about. Two things struck me as I was reading it.

The first, the amounts of money. Oh, I'd seen the amounts mentioned elsewhere, and in other articles, but it didn't quite sink in. Words like "million" and "billion" get tossed around all the time, but the book got into things like the $19,000 a week hotel suite Abramoff's partner rented, the luxury cars, and the continuous amounts of money they got off people, and the chains of "non-profits" most of it got laundered through before finally ending up in their pockets. It's ridiculous. It didn't seem like the kind of thing that'd really happen, but I guess it did. And it's hard for most people to grasp the scale of things, because numbers on that magnitude are just numbers, they don't tie to anything we normally deal with. And when they're just written as $45 million", it gets mentally translated to "big". So I think newspapers should start writing out the whole number for things like that. $45,000,000 looks bigger than "$45 million." And $45,000,000,000 is visibly bigger than $45 billion, and easier to distinguish from "45 million.'

And the other thing that struck me was the excerpts from some of the emails that got sent around in high powered Washington lobbyist circles. They read like emails written by 14 year old AOLers. Spelling, and grammar and capitalization all optional, u instead of you, r instead of are, and way way way too many exclamation points. These were the kind of people who could bilk tribes out of millions of dollars and bribe Congresscritters into covering for little more than slavery? Man. I guess literacy isn't really valued that much, is it?
forsyth: (Politics Icon)
I'm reading The K Street Gang. It's mostly about a trio of College Republican buddies whose names anybody with a passing familiarity with politics should recognize. Ralph Reed, Grover Norquist, and Jack Abramoff. The other major player? A Mr. Tom Delay. It's by Matthew Continetti, a conservative activist/writer who worked for the Weekly Standard, which explains things like referring to Ronald Reagan as "the great man".

But it doesn't really matter who wrote it. True, the plots and conspiracies and corruption involved are still unfolding, but it's obvious from reading that this is nothing new, the endemic corruption of the entire Republican leadership and their fealty to lobbyists has been there all along. Parts of it read like a spy novel. Grover Norquist, anti-tax crusader running around in the African jungle with "freedom fighters"? Apparently it happened, back in the 80s.

Abramoff being paid millions of dollars to get Tom Delay and other leaders out to the US Territory of the Northern Marianas islands? All in order to protect the horrible working conditions and "guest worker" programs that the Northern Marianas could use to make clothes stamped with "MADE IN THE USA"? (Money, incidentally, that came from US grants to the islands). The corruption and scandals aren't some kind of accident, they're how these guys operated, from the very beginning. And that's not even touching on the "K Street Project" or the explosion of lobbyists or any of the rest.

Which, honestly, makes sense. If you really believe that government is the problem and doesn't ever help anyone, where's the harm in using it to enrich yourself and your buddies? The money was going to be wasted anyway, obviously. Right?

And in false equivalency news, you've got people who claim one Democratic congresscritter from Louisiana accepting bribes OBVIOUSLY means "both sides" are "just as bad". Hey, if they're corrupt, we're better off without them, I figure.

Profile

forsyth: (Default)
Forsyth

May 2018

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
202122 23242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 10th, 2026 10:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios