forsyth: (Default)
[personal profile] forsyth
At least we know if the laws of physics were to suddenly change one day, we'd notice, because of the innumerable high school and college science classes replicating basic experiments every day.

Date: 2010-09-26 06:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leticia.livejournal.com
Not necessarily! When I was in college physics, we had bad equipment that tended to give me really weird results, so I just start calculating the values I 'should' get and putting them in.

Now, how do I know it was REALLY the equipment, not a previously undiscovered amendment to the laws of physics?

Date: 2010-09-27 02:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] forsythferret.livejournal.com
That's where the millions of samples come in. If you have enough variables, almost everything becomes a normal distribution (the bell curve one), so therefore the aggregate numbers should be distributed around the correct numbers.

Of course, that's assuming the professors and TAs are keeping actual track of the data, or even reading the lab reports, which may be questionable.

Also, I hear you on the bad lab equipment, our hydraulics stuff was prone to getting bubbles in the line to the manometer to read the pressure, and if that happens, then your data is junk!

Profile

forsyth: (Default)
Forsyth

May 2018

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
202122 23242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 03:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios